Catch stale docs
before they hit main.
DocDrift checks changed code against your README, docs, and examples. It flags when the docs are now wrong, incomplete, or missing, then helps fix them before merge.
Catches docs drift where it happens
DocDrift looks at staged code changes, maps them to related docs, and flags when the docs are now wrong.
Fits the workflow developers already use
Run it in the CLI before commit, or in GitHub Actions so every PR gets the same check automatically.
Specialized beats generic
General AI agents can update docs when you ask. DocDrift is valuable because it remembers to ask every time.
Why this instead of an agent
Agents can update docs.
DocDrift makes sure someone remembers to.
The real value is not that an LLM can write a paragraph. The real value is that DocDrift checks the same thing every time a repo changes, in the same place your team already reviews code.
| Category | DocDrift | General AI agent |
|---|---|---|
| Change-aware | Reads the staged diff and checks only what changed | Usually needs a prompt and human context |
| Workflow-native | Works in commits and PR checks | Usually lives in chat or the editor |
| Docs-specific | Focused on stale docs, examples, params, returns, and missing docs | Broad, but less opinionated and less repeatable |
| Team consistency | Runs the same way every time | Quality depends on the person asking |
API teams
Catch outdated README examples, return values, and exceptions before customers copy the wrong flow.
Open-source maintainers
Keep installation steps, examples, and feature docs aligned with the code people actually pull.
Small engineering teams
Add one guardrail to your workflow instead of asking every engineer to remember docs manually.
GitHub Actions
Same detection logic in the CLI and in PRs
Run DocDrift locally before commit, then enforce the same check on pull requests. The specialized engine stays consistent across both surfaces.
Pricing path
Start free. Charge for private team convenience.
The easiest path to paid usage is keeping the open-source CLI free, then charging teams for private-repo workflows and convenience layers.
CLI, local AI, open-source repos, pre-commit hook, and basic GitHub Action use.
Best path for first 100 paying users: private repos, smoother onboarding, higher fix volume, and team support.
Add policies, org-wide defaults, PR reporting, and simple admin controls once the core paid path is proven.
Start here
Stop shipping stale docs.
Install DocDrift, run it on one real repo, and use that proof to attract your first users. The product sells best when it prevents a mistake someone almost merged today.